翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ Williams Township, Aitkin County, Minnesota ・ Williams Township, Calhoun County, Iowa ・ Williams Township, Dauphin County, Pennsylvania ・ Williams Township, Michigan ・ Williams Township, Northampton County, Pennsylvania ・ Williams Township, Pennsylvania ・ Williams Township, Sangamon County, Illinois ・ Williams tube ・ Williams Unified School District ・ Williams v Attorney-General ・ Williams v Bayley ・ Williams v Carwardine ・ Williams v Commonwealth ・ Williams v Compair Maxam Ltd ・ Williams v Hensman ・ Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd ・ Williams v Roffey Bros & Nicholls (Contractors) Ltd ・ Williams v The Queen ・ Williams V-Jet II ・ Williams v. Florida ・ Williams v. Lee ・ Williams v. Mississippi ・ Williams v. North Carolina (1942) ・ Williams v. Price ・ Williams v. Pryor ・ Williams v. Rhodes ・ Williams v. Vidmar ・ Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Co. ・ Williams Valley Railroad ・ Williams Valley School District Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd ： ウィキペディア英語版 Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd ''Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd'' () (UKHL 17 ) is an important English tort law, company law and contract law case. It held that for there to be an effective assumption of responsibility, there must be some direct or indirect conveyance that a director had done so, and that a claimant had relied on the information. Otherwise only a company itself, as a separate legal person, would be liable for negligent information. ==Facts== Mr Williams and his partner approached Natural Life Health Foods Ltd with a proposal. They wanted to get a franchise for a health food shop in Rugby (i.e. they wanted to use the Natural Life brand to run a new store and pay Natural Life Ltd a fixed fee). Mr Williams was given a brochure with financial projections. They entered the scheme. They failed, and lost money. So Mr Williams sued the company, alleging that the advice they got was negligent. However, before the suit could be completed, Natural Life Health Foods Ltd went into liquidation. So Mr Williams sought to hold the company's managing director and main shareholder personally liable. This was Mr Mistlin, who in the brochure had been held out as having a lot of expertise. Mr Mistlin had made the brochure projections, but had not been in any of the negotiations with Mr Williams. The High Court allowed Mr Williams claim, and so did the Court of Appeal by a majority. The company and Mr Mistlin appealed to the House of Lords. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Williams v Natural Life Health Foods Ltd」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.